Hey ppl, as suggested by a friend of mine, I've decided to post one of my comments on her post as a blog entry. The discussion was on Gandhi and Ambani, as two movies (viz. "Lage Raho Munnabhai" and "Guru") have come on recently and brings in two schools of thought on how changes were made in India. Which thought would you opt for?
Original Post:
Original Post:
Gurugiri v/s Gandhigiri
"I thought I'd be diplomatic and keep away, but something deep within me wasn't letting me do that and forced me to begin typing...it's a curse I say!
Gurugiri Vs Gandhigiri...let the battle begin...
1) Gandhi stands in front of the British and says "Get out" (alright so maybe it was "Quit India") and they say no..years of non-obedience later they leave....Guru stands in front of the Parsi community in Mumbai and says "Quit killing progress with ur practises and let us trade in peace"...a couple of intelligent gestures later they cede defeat....Guru 1 - Gandhi 1
2) The British imposes a law that brought out a salt tax. Gandhi defied it and "Dandi March" was marked as a prominent mark in history and a twist (couldn't get a good word here :D ) in our fight for freedom....License Raj and complicated laws prevailed in India that restricted free trade in india...Guru defied it by cheating the Govt. out of export duties....Gandhi 0.5 - Guru 1.5 (since we are referring to Gandhi in Lage Raho....)
3) Gandhi along with many other freedom fighters including Mohd. Ali Jinnah (True he was also the reason why we have a Pakistan and a Bangladesh but hey...he was crucial in our freedom struggle) got us our independence....Guru (The real one) along with many other prominent businessmen provided valuable input that eventually resulted in the Govt. Of India to modify business rules in the country and eventually kill the license raj (although not completely)....Gandhi 1 - Guru 1
Hmm....Guru leads I guess...
my opinion?..they are pretty much the same...we are all humans and we all tend to have our shades of grey...I personally don't think anything in this world can be achieved by being a complete angel, often fighting fire with fire is an only option and if you were to fight it with water then (referring to an electrical fire) you'd probably lose the race (in a big way wrt. the example given) in the end. Being oblivious to this is pretty much living in a fantasy world...wake up and smell the thorns (where have I heard that??) 'coz life ain't a bed of roses!"
Mon Feb 19, 01:58:00 PM
Well, I guess we cant simply compare these two giris.. The motives are very much different. See one has the word "Profit" connected to it.and then it s another game, the other is all about freedom struggle.The freedom we guys enjoy now...
Guru's ways may be colored gray.but ofcourse it is smart bussines.Still the biggest beneficiary is he himself.
Mon May 14, 03:02:00 PM
1). May be you forgot that the Indian Government is elected by us only. What ever rules, we have are for every citizen of India. If you are favouring Guru giri then how come you can oppose illegal buisnesses of underworld and so on.
2). If every one start doing the same thing as Guru, individually we will be having great future but not as a nation.
3). Personally i not in favour of Gandagiri as its also a kind of blackmail(emotional) as well as saying somthing like i have numbers what you have now.